Next, we determine which ASVs are driving these patterns and assess their distribution in nature. We use statistical tests to identify ASVs that are enriched in a particular host species and then determine where else those sequences have been found.

We now have a good handle on the diversity of the intestinal microbiomes of these herbivorous reef fish. We know that communities are dominated by the same broad-level taxonomic groups. The beta diversity analysis demonstrates that communities partition along host species.

To summarize, our goals here are to:

  1. identify differentially abundant (DA) ASVs across host species,
  2. find closest matches to DA ASVs using publicly available data, and
  3. perform phylogenetic reconstruction on DA ASVs and top hits.

To accomplish these goals we leave the R environment and employ some additional tools.

Differential Abundance (DA)

We used LDA Effect Size (LEfSe) to identify differentially abundant (DA) ASVs across host species and the MicrobiomeAnalyst webserver to run the analysis. There are also many other great tools on the MicrobiomeAnalyst webserver by the way. We needed three files for the input—an ‘OTU’ table, a metadata file containing sample information, and a taxonomy table. We generate these tables with the code below.

########## OTU table
OTU1 <-  as(otu_table(ps_slv_work_filt), "matrix")
# transpose if necessary
# Coerce to data.frame
OTUdf <- as.data.frame(t(OTU1))
setDT(OTUdf, keep.rownames = TRUE)[]
write.table(OTUdf, "DATA/PHYLOSEQ/TABLES/OUTPUT/OTHER/seq_tab_for_core.txt",
    sep = "\t", row.names = FALSE, quote = FALSE)
colnames(OTUdf)[1] <- "#NAME"
write.table(OTUdf, "DATA/PHYLOSEQ/TABLES/OUTPUT/LEfSe/LEfSe_INPUT_seq_tab.txt",
            sep = "\t", row.names = FALSE, quote = FALSE)
############ TAX Table
# Remember in the `tax_table` we added the last columns as the actual sequence
# of each ASV and the ASV_ID. We do not need those here.
# So lets only keep the first 6 columns (the taxonomic lineage)
TAX1 <- as(tax_table(ps_slv_work_filt), "matrix")
TAXdf <- as.data.frame(TAX1)
setDT(TAXdf, keep.rownames = TRUE)[]
colnames(TAXdf)[1] <- "#TAXONOMY"
TAXdf <- TAXdf[, 1:6]
write.table(TAXdf, "DATA/PHYLOSEQ/TABLES/OUTPUT/LEfSe/LEfSe_INPUT_tax_tab.txt",
            sep = "\t", row.names = FALSE, quote = FALSE)
############ Metadata file
meta_file <- data.frame(NAME = sample_name, SampleType = species, Gen = genus)
rownames(meta_file) <- samples.out
colnames(meta_file) <-  c("#NAME", "Species", "Genus")
# but we still have those three samples that need to be removed
meta_file <- filter(meta_file, Species != "SpChr" & Species != "ScVet")
write.table(meta_file, "DATA/PHYLOSEQ/TABLES/OUTPUT/LEfSe/LEfSe_INPUT_metadata.txt",
            sep = "\t", row.names = FALSE, quote = FALSE)

And once we have the three files, we head over to the MicrobiomeAnalyst webserver and upload the files. Be sure to select Silva taxonomy in the drop-down menu. Check the data summary after uploading the files:

  • OTU annotation: SILVA
  • OTU number: 11144
  • OTU with ≥ 2 counts: 4121
  • Sample number: 50
  • Number of experimental factors: 2
  • Total read counts: 2828112
  • Average counts per sample: 56562
  • Maximum counts per sample: 175116
  • Minimum counts per sample: 11568

Cool, all looks good. Hit Proceed. Here are the settings we used for the different step:

  • Filter the data: Minimum count = 20, Prevalence in samples (%) = 20, and Percentage to remove (%) = 0. This removed 3796 low abundant ASVs.
  • Data Normalization: Data rarefying = Do not rarefy my data, Data scaling = Total sum scaling (TSS), and Data transformation = Do not transform my data.
  • LEfSe analysis Log LDA score = 4 & Adjusted p-value cutoff = 0.0001. We specifically chose these values because we found that they eliminated spurious results such as DA ASVs that were really abundant in a few samples but not consistent across an entire group.

The result was 59 differentially abundant (DA) ASVs.

Results of LEfSe Analysis

We can inspect and save the results of the LEfSe analysis. The table shows the Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) scores, P-values adjusted for multiple testing, and False Discovery Rate (FDR) values from the LEfSe analysis. Normalized read abundance values for each host species are also given.

Table S5
lefse_tab <- read.table("DATA/PHYLOSEQ/TABLES/INPUT/lefse_results.txt",
                        header = TRUE, sep = "\t", check.names = FALSE)
write.table(lefse_tab, "DATA/PHYLOSEQ/TABLES/OUTPUT/SUPP/Table_S5.txt",
            quote = FALSE, sep = "\t", row.names = FALSE)

datatable(lefse_tab, rownames = FALSE, width = "100%",
          caption =
            htmltools::tags$caption(
              style = "caption-side: bottom; text-align: left;",
              "Table 4: ", htmltools::em("Results of LEfSe analysis.")),
          extensions = "FixedColumns", "Buttons",
          options = list(columnDefs =
                           list(list(className = "dt-center",
                                     targets = c(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8))),
                         dom = "Blfrtip", pageLength = 5,
                         lengthMenu = c(5, 10, 25, 60),
                         buttons = c("csv", "copy"),
                         scrollX = TRUE, scrollCollapse = TRUE))

Something about these tables that break my formatting :/

Core Microbiome

Before getting knee deep in the DA ASV analysis lets see if we can’t identify some core elements, or ASVs, to these fish. First we need a mothur-formatted .shared file. This is the code …

cm <- read.table("DATA/PHYLOSEQ/TABLES/OUTPUT/OTHER/seq_tab_for_core.txt",
                 sep = "\t", header = TRUE, row.names = 1)
cm_t <- t(cm)
cm_df <- as.data.frame(cm_t)
numcols <- ncol(cm_df)
cm_df <- cm_df %>% tibble::rownames_to_column("Group")
cm_df <- cm_df %>%
  mutate(label = 0.03, numOtus = numcols) %>%
  select(label, Group, numOtus, everything())

write.table(cm_df, "DATA/PHYLOSEQ/TABLES/OUTPUT/OTHER/ps_slv_work_filt.txt",
            quote = FALSE, sep = "\t", row.names = FALSE)

####COMBINE by fish species

cm_Merge <- cm %>% tibble::rownames_to_column("ASV")

cm_Merge <- cm_Merge %>% mutate(AcCoe =
                                  AcCoe01 + AcCoe02 + AcCoe03 + AcCoe04 +
                                  AcCoe05 + AcCoe06 + AcCoe07 + AcCoe08)
cm_Merge <- cm_Merge %>% mutate(AcTra =
                                  AcTra01 + AcTra02 + AcTra03 + AcTra04 +
                                  AcTra05 + AcTra06 + AcTra07 + AcTra08 +
                                  AcTra09)
cm_Merge <- cm_Merge %>% mutate(ScTra =
                                  ScTae01 + ScTae02 + ScTae03 + ScTae04 +
                                  ScTae05 + ScTae06 + ScTae07 + ScTae08 +
                                  ScTae09)
cm_Merge <- cm_Merge %>% mutate(SpAur =
                                  SpAur01 + SpAur02 + SpAur03 + SpAur04 +
                                  SpAur05 + SpAur06 + SpAur07 + SpAur08 +
                                  SpAur09 + SpAur10 + SpAur11 + SpAur12 +
                                  SpAur13)
cm_Merge <- cm_Merge %>% mutate(SpVir =
                                  SpVir01 + SpVir02 + SpVir03 + SpVir04 +
                                  SpVir05 + SpVir06 + SpVir07 + SpVir08 +
                                  SpVir09 + SpVir10 + SpVir11)

cm_Merge <- cm_Merge %>% select(ASV, AcCoe, AcTra, ScTra, SpAur, SpVir)
cm_Merge_2 <- cm_Merge[, -1]
rownames(cm_Merge_2) <- cm_Merge[, 1]

cm_Merge_2_t <- t(cm_Merge_2)
cm_Merge_2_df <- as.data.frame(cm_Merge_2_t)

cm_Merge_2_df <- cm_Merge_2_df %>%
  tibble::rownames_to_column("Group")
cm_Merge_2_df <- cm_Merge_2_df %>%
  mutate(label = 0.03, numOtus = numcols) %>%
  select(label, Group, numOtus, everything())
write.table(cm_Merge_2_df, "DATA/PHYLOSEQ/TABLES/OUTPUT/OTHER/ps_slv_work_filt_combine.txt",
            quote = FALSE, sep = "\t", row.names = FALSE)

Next we use the output to run get.coremicrobiome in mothur. And the truth is this analysis never went anywhere…

Searching Public Databases

Next we wanted to know where else these sequences had been detected in nature. There is a huge wealth of publicly available sequence information from many studies and habitats. We can use this information to get a better idea of the distribution and habitat specificity of the DA ASVs. To accomplish this we performed the following steps:

  1. First we needed a phyloseq object that only contained the DA ASVs. To do this, we passed an object consisting of just these 59 ASVs (from the LEfSe analysis) to the phyloseq function prune_taxa. We needed two different ps objects, one from the unmerged object (ps_slv_work_filt) and the other from the merged-by-genus object (mergedGP).
  2. Next we needed a fasta file of our DA ASVs. We could not find an easy way to export a fasta file from the new ps objects. So we tried this using the tax_table. This approach works but, well, it is not very elegant. If you want a fasta file from any other ps objects just swipe out the name of the ps object in the code below. Anyway, we will generate and save a fasta file.
  3. On the mac we used to analyze the data, for some reason, saves the fasta file with Line Break Type as Legacy Mac(CR). This may be incompatible with other programs and needs to be changed to UNIX (LS). I know, don’t quit my day job, except this is my day job :/

    # Object of DA ASVs
    lefse_asvs <- c("ASV21", "ASV25", "ASV35", "ASV44", "ASV159",
                    "ASV17", "ASV174", "ASV22", "ASV234", "ASV60",
                    "ASV114", "ASV268", "ASV14", "ASV226", "ASV23",
                    "ASV29", "ASV30", "ASV48", "ASV90", "ASV98", "ASV18",
                    "ASV41", "ASV7", "ASV43", "ASV5", "ASV54", "ASV8",
                    "ASV9", "ASV250", "ASV12", "ASV32", "ASV34", "ASV39",
                    "ASV224", "ASV398", "ASV127", "ASV128", "ASV151",
                    "ASV323", "ASV359", "ASV374", "ASV91", "ASV56", "ASV6",
                    "ASV165", "ASV284", "ASV395", "ASV450", "ASV15", "ASV2",
                    "ASV20", "ASV298", "ASV57", "ASV69", "ASV75", "ASV82",
                    "ASV1", "ASV70", "ASV49")
    
    # Create ps objects
    da_asvs <- prune_taxa(lefse_asvs, mergedGP)
    da_asvs_full <- prune_taxa(lefse_asvs, ps_slv_work_filt)
    # Create fasta file from tax_table
    table2format <- tax_table(da_asvs)
    #retain only the column with the sequences
    table2format_trim <- table2format[, 7]
    table2format_trim_df <- data.frame(row.names(table2format_trim),
                                       table2format_trim)
    colnames(table2format_trim_df) <- c("ASV_ID", "ASV_SEQ")
    #format fasta
    table2format_trim_df$ASV_ID <- sub("ASV", ">ASV", table2format_trim_df$ASV_ID)
    
    write.table(table2format_trim_df, "DATA/PHYLOSEQ/TABLES/OUTPUT/ASV_FOR_BLAST.fasta",
                sep = "\r", col.names = FALSE, row.names = FALSE,
                quote = FALSE, fileEncoding = "UTF-8")
  4. With our newly created DA ASV fasta file we can move on to database searching. We used BLASTn against the nr database to search publicly available sequence data. We used these settings:
    • optimized for highly similar sequences (megablast)
    • Expect threshold = 10
    • Word size = 28
    • Match/Mismatch Scores = 1, -2
    • Gap Costs = linear
    • retain top 10 hits
  5. Here are the top BLAST hits for each DA ASV. The table displays a lot of information about each BLAST search (it scrolls along the x-axis by the way). Most importantly are the accession numbers of top BLAST hits (subject acc.var), number of 100% identical matches (num perfect hits), the percent identity, and some info on where/when the hit sequence was originally found. Where applicable, there is also PubMedIDs so you can find the paper that reported the sequence. Looking at this table will give you a preliminary sense of the ecology of these ASVs. For example, most hits come from intestinal communities, many of which are marine herbivorous fish. But the low percent identity of several ASVs indicates that these sequences have been poorly sampled. This is not surprising given the geographic skew of sampling.

    Top hits from BLASTn analysis

    blast_tab <- read.table("DATA/PHYLOSEQ/TABLES/INPUT/BLAST_results.txt",
                            header = TRUE, sep = "\t", check.names = FALSE)
    write.table(blast_tab, "DATA/PHYLOSEQ/TABLES/OUTPUT/BLAST_RESULTS.txt",
                row.names = FALSE, sep = "\t", quote = FALSE)
    
    datatable(blast_tab, rownames = FALSE,
              caption =
                htmltools::tags$caption(
                  style = "caption-side: bottom; text-align: left;",
                  "Supplementary Table 6: ",
                  htmltools::em("Results of BLASTn analysis.")),
              extensions = "FixedColumns", "Buttons",
              options = list(columnDefs =
                               list(list(className = "dt-center",
                                         targets = c(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8))),
                             dom = "Blfrtip", pageLength = 5,
                             lengthMenu = c(5, 10, 25, 65),
                             buttons = c("csv", "copy"),
                             scrollX = TRUE, scrollCollapse = TRUE))

    This table also scrolls horizontally.

    Several ASVs returned more than one match at 100%. For some ASVs, the 100% matches were from the same study/study organism, so we just selected one as the representative. ASVs 6, 12, 224, and 398 returned numerous 100% matches (out of 50 total). These data were impractical to summarize and not very informative anyway. So we elected to leave these data out. If you want to see what these hits are, just grab the ASV sequence and BLAST away. Also, some ASVs shared the same top hit. Since the table is ‘by ASV’ we retained all duplicate hits.
  6. For phylogenetic inference we used the Silva Alignment, Classification and Tree Service to obtain neighbors of DA ASVs. We used these settings:
    • Search and classify: min identity = 0.95; Number of neighbors = 5.
    • Default parameters for the remainder of the workflow.
  7. We then combined the results of the BLASTn and Silva ACT analyses and omitted duplicate hits, resulting in 297 top hit sequences for phylogenetic analysis.

Phylogenetic Inference

Short read sequences are not ideal for phylogenetic analysis, but given the data we have, we felt this was a good place to start. This analysis required several steps.
  1. We used mothur (v.1.42.1, Last updated: 5/13/19) and the Silva full length sequences and taxonomy references (release 132) to align the DA ASVs and our new reference db, and also classify the sequences. We used a hard mask to trim all long reads to the same length (~373bp) and 16S region as the ASVs.
  2. mothur "#align.seqs(candidate=sequence_tree.fasta, template=silva.nr_v132.align, processors=20, flip=t)"
    mothur "#filter.seqs(fasta=sequence_tree.fasta, vertical = =F, hard=mask.txt)"
    mothur "#classify.seqs(fasta=sequence_tree.filter.fasta, template=silva.nr_v132.align, taxonomy=silva.nr_v132.tax, processors=10)"
    
  3. Now that we had our 59 DA ASVs and the top database hits, its was time for phylogenetic inference. We used RAxML-HPC to generate a phylogenetic tree (with Aquifex as the outgroup)
  4. raxmlHPC-PTHREADS-SSE3 -T 24 -f a -p 2345 -x 3456 -m GTRGAMMA  -N 1000 -s sequence_tree.filter.fasta -n fish_arb_align_1000BS_B.tre
    


Previous

Next

Edit this page